A man from elsewhere comes to New Mexico and builds his own house, and it’s easy—especially from the outside—to slot that gesture into a lineage of land art, punk refusal, Americana self-reliance. But from a New Mexican, Latinx perspective, the land has never been an empty medium waiting for inscription. It is already written on. It holds acequia routes, burial grounds, grazing paths, old grants broken by courts, fences that came later. The desert is not a blank canvas; it’s a palimpsest.
So when Donald Grose builds his own house, the act doesn’t begin with Smithson. It begins with adobe. With families who have been mixing mud and straw for centuries, raising walls with cousins and neighbors, not as an art gesture but because shelter had to be made by hand. DIY here isn’t rebellion; it’s inheritance. It’s what you do when banks don’t lend to you, when developers aren’t building for you, when survival depends on knowing how to fix a roof before the monsoon rolls in.
That shifts the meaning of the gesture.
The punk ethic—do it yourself, don’t ask permission—resonates, yes. But in New Mexico, permission has always been complicated. Whose permission? The state’s? The county’s? The land grant’s? The tribe’s? The family’s? Suspicion of institutions didn’t arrive with hardcore; it arrived with conquest, with broken treaties, with property lines drawn in distant offices. Self-building isn’t just aesthetic refusal. It can also be memory of exclusion.
And the land-art comparison feels different too. Smithson treated earth as material for concept. Here, earth is also ancestor. It feeds chile, it cracks in drought, it remembers footsteps. To “carve meaning into the ground” implies that meaning wasn’t already there. From this vantage point, building a house is less about inscribing and more about entering into relationship—accepting wind that never stops, light that bleaches everything honest, water that must be shared carefully.
The Americana thread—self-reliance, wide-open space, grit—also carries weight. Those mythologies often flatten the Southwest into backdrop for individual freedom. But wide-open spaces here are layered with labor: shepherding, railroad work, fieldwork, military bases, uranium mines. Weather and waiting aren’t romantic—they’re economic facts. Work is not a metaphor; it’s generational.
So Grose’s house, seen from here, becomes something slightly more complicated than a “punk gesture slowed to desert time.” It enters a landscape where slowness was already practiced, where building with your hands was never countercultural but ordinary. The difference may lie in intention. Is the house a retreat from systems, or a joining of place? Is it an artwork, or does it become accountable to community and land?
There is still something admirable in choosing to build your own shelter. That kind of labor earns respect anywhere. But in New Mexico, the act sits inside a much older continuum of mud walls, vigas, tin roofs, and patched fences. It doesn’t begin the story; it joins it.
From a Latinx, non-gringo perspective, the most interesting question isn’t whether the house echoes punk or land art. It’s whether it listens. Whether it learns the rhythm of acequia cleanings, of vecinos helping raise a wall, of wind that sandblasts pride down to humility. In that sense, the house is not just an earthwork you can sleep in. It is a test of belonging.
And belonging here is not carved into the ground. It is grown, slowly, in the ground.
No comments:
Post a Comment